FAILED plan_version=1 last_final_decision=—
类型: iteration project_id: p-9754e10bb3 parent_edict_id: —
[R12.8.3 phantom-SHA prevention test] ## 详细目标 测试 base_minister push fail raise (token expired, 应 raise 而非 log warn)。 6 部跑完后, 不会有 phantom SHA 写 sishu_artifacts,而是 push fail → step fail → edict 异常
| step | name | dept | depends_on | status | acceptance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | libu: 准备测试夹具并声明 base_minister 推送契约 | libu | — | DISPATCHED | 提供伪造的 token-expired git remote(或 mock git push 接口),使 base_minister.push() 调用必然失败; 文档化 push 失败应 raise 而非 log.warn 的契约条款 |
| S2 | bingbu: 编写 6 部顺序执行剧本并捕获每步异常 | bingbu | S1 | PENDING | 脚本依次调用 6 个部(不含中书/门下)各产生 1 条 artifact,每步捕获异常并向上抛; 确保每步失败时 step.fail() 被触发,不被吞掉 |
| S3 | xingbu: 验证 push fail raise 行为符合 R12.8.3 期望 | xingbu | S2 | PENDING | 确认 base_minister.push() 在 token expired 时抛出异常,日志中无 'phantom SHA' 痕迹; 断言 sishu_artifacts 表本次运行行数增量 = 0 |
| S4 | hubu: 验证 edict 异常退出闭环与审计可追溯 | hubu | S3 | PENDING | 确认 edict e-9d6b9bde8fff 状态为 FAILED 且含 push_fail 根因; sishu_audit 中存在 6 部尝试记录且均标记为 push-blocked |
2026-07-21T00:10:49.467634+00:00dashboard NULL → DRAFTING consult-then-confirm (iteration): R12.8.3 phantom-SHA prevention test2026-07-21T00:10:56.598644+00:00zhongshu DRAFTING → PLAN_REVIEW plan drafted (v1, 4 steps)2026-07-21T00:11:00.515974+00:00zhongshu NULL → PLAN_REVIEW 已发 PLAN_REVIEW_REQUEST2026-07-21T00:11:01.215606+00:00menxia PLAN_REVIEW → EXECUTING plan 550 approved (review_plan check passed)2026-07-21T00:11:36.061449+00:00libu NULL → FAILED execute_step error: abstract GITEA_TOKEN missing, 不允许 phantom SHA
{"edict_id": "e-9d6b9bde8fff", "message_type": "DRAFT_REQUEST", "goal": "[R12.8.3 phantom-SHA prevention test] \n\n## 详细目标\n测试 base_minister push fail raise (token expired, 应 raise 而非 log warn)。 6 部跑完后, 不会有 phantom SHA 写 sishu_artifacts,而是 push fail → step fail → edict 异常", "constraints": ["[]"], "acceptance_criteria": ["[]"], "title": "R12.8.3 phantom-SHA prevention test", "summary": ""}{"title":"R12.8.3 phantom-SHA prevention test","summary":"验证 base_minister 在 token expired 时 push fail 应 raise 而非仅 log warn:6 部依次跑完后不留下 phantom SHA 写 sishu_artifacts,push fail 触发 step fail → edict 异常退出闭环。","plan":[{"step_key":"S1","name":"libu: 准备测试夹具并声明 base_minister 推送契约","owner_department":"libu","depends_on":[],"acceptance_criteria":["提供伪造的 token-expired git remote(或 mock git push 接口),使 base_minister.push() 调用必然失败","文档化 push 失败应 raise 而非 log.warn 的契约条款","在测试 runbook 中声明本次运行不会向 sishu_artifacts 写入任何 SHA"]},{"step_key":"S2","name":"bingbu: 编写 6 部顺序执行剧本并捕获每步异常","owner_department":"bingbu","depends_on":["S1"],"acceptance_criteria":["脚本依次调用 6 个部(不含中书/门下)各产生 1 条 artifact,每步捕获异常并向上抛","确保每步失败时 step.fail() 被触发,不被吞掉","统计本次运行尝试写入 sishu_artifacts 的 SHA 集合(应为 0)"]},{"step_key":"S3","name":"xingbu: 验证 push fail raise 行为符合 R12.8.3 期望","owner_department":"xingbu","depends_on":["S2"],"acceptance_criteria":["确认 base_minister.push() 在 token expired 时抛出异常,日志中无 'phantom SHA' 痕迹","断言 sishu_artifacts 表本次运行行数增量 = 0","若发现 phantom SHA 残留则测试失败,需回退 base_minister 实现"]},{"step_key":"S4","name":"hubu: 验证 edict 异常退出闭环与审计可追溯","owner_department":"hubu","depends_on":["S3"],"acceptance_criteria":["确认 edict e-9d6b9bde8fff 状态为 FAILED 且含 push_fail 根因","sishu_audit 中存在 6 部尝试记录且均标记为 push-blocked","无任何 commit / SHA 写入 sishu_artifacts"]}],"estimated_dept":4,"project_type":"r12_8_3_phantom_sha_prevention_test"}{'prompt': '你是 sishu 吏部 (RBAC). 严格按当前 step acceptance_criteria 输出 (不要越界). 写一个 RBAC 配置 markdown 含 yaml: untitled. 基于: . edict=e-9d6b9bde8fff step=S1. 包含: 1. ServiceAccount 2. Role 3. RoleBinding 4. 最小权限原则. 写真 RBAC yaml, 不是空模板. 写真吏部角色 (RBAC), 不要越界做代码或部署.\n\n## 完整 edict context (来自 PG):\n## current date\n2026-07-21T00:11:02 UTC\n\n## git status\nclean (无未提交修改)\n## edict (e-9d6b9bde8fff, state=EXECUTING, plan_v=1)\n**goal**: [R12.8.3 phantom-SHA prevention test] \n\n## 详细目标\n测试 base_minister push fail raise (token expired, 应 raise 而非 log warn)。 6 部跑完后, 不会有 phantom SHA 写 sishu_artifacts,而是 push fail → step fail → edict 异常\n**project_type**: iteration\n**created_at**: 2026-07-21 00:10:49.467634+00:00\n\n## plan (4 步):\n - S1: libu: 准备测试夹具并声明 base_minister 推送契约 → libu (DISPATCHED) ⬅\n - S2: bingbu: 编写 6 部顺序执行剧本并捕获每步异常 → bingbu (PENDING)\n - S3: xingbu: 验证 push fail raise 行为符合 R12.8.3 期望 → xingbu (PENDING)\n - S4: hubu: 验证 edict 异常退出闭环与审计可追溯 → hubu (PENDING)\n\n## 当前 step (S1: libu: 准备测试夹具并声明 base_minister 推送契约) acceptance_criteria:\n - 提供伪造的 token-expired git remote(或 mock git push 接口),使 base_minister.push() 调用必然失败\n - 文档化 push 失败应 raise 而非 log.warn 的契约条款\n - 在测试 runbook 中声明本次运行不会向 sishu_artifacts 写入任何 SHA\n\n## audit history (最近 4 条):\n - 00:10:49 dashboard: None→DRAFTING (consult-then-confirm (iteration): R12.8.3 phantom-)\n - 00:10:56 zhongshu: DRAFTING→PLAN_REVIEW (plan drafted (v1, 4 steps))\n - 00:11:00 zhongshu: None→PLAN_REVIEW (已发 PLAN_REVIEW_REQUEST)\n - 00:11:0I'll execute S1 strictly within 吏部 (RBAC) boundaries: prepare the RBAC test fixture for R12.8.3 phantom-SHA prevention, including a fake token-expired git remote mock and a Role/RoleBinding that grants the test runner the minimal permissions needed to invoke `base_minister.push()` against the mock.
```yaml
---
# RBAC Configuration: libu / R12.8.3 phantom-SHA prevention test
# Edict: e-9d6b9bde8fff Step: S1
# Scope: test fixture ONLY (mock git remote + minimal RBAC for test runner)
# Boundary: 吏部不写业务代码 / 不部署 / 不晋升 Skill
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: libu-r1283-test-runner
namespace: sishu-test
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: libu-r1283-test-runner
app.kubernetes.io/component: rbac-test-fixture
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: sishu
sishu.edict: e-9d6b9bde8fff
sishu.step: S1
sishu.department: libu
sishu.test-case: r12.8.3-phantom-sha-prevention
annotations:
sishu.edict/id: "e-9d6b9bde8fff"
sishu.step/id: "S1"
sishu.test.purpose: "verify base_minister.push() raises (not warn) on token-expired; no SHA written to sishu_artifacts"
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
name: libu-r1283-test-runner-role
namespace: sishu-test
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: libu-r1283-test-runner
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: sishu
sishu.edict: e-9d6b9bde8fff
sishu.department: libu
rules:
# ---- minimum verbs to drive the test fixture ----
# read configmaps holding the mock remote